{"id":1947,"date":"2014-04-01T23:08:47","date_gmt":"2014-04-01T23:08:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/archee.uqam.ca\/?p=1947"},"modified":"2022-11-30T23:09:02","modified_gmt":"2022-11-30T23:09:02","slug":"avril-2014-lines-of-immersion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archee.uqam.ca\/avril-2014-lines-of-immersion\/","title":{"rendered":"Avril 2014 – Lines of Immersion"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
The Satosphere at the Society for Arts and Technology in Montreal (SAT) is a technical place; its function is to technically optimise the possibilities of experimenting with experiences of immersion and virtuality. According to the layout of the Satosphere space what is required for such experiences is a homogenous and neutral background for the projected sound and visuals. This is reflected by the dome-shaped interior, which is dark and silent with a circular ground plan that geometrically enhances such homogeneity and neutrality. The spatial layout of the Satosphere, however, calls for a discussion of the ways in which the enclosure and totality of this space conditions the experience of immersion and virtuality. An unambiguously defined space like the Satosphere is a challenge and not necessarily easy to engage with beyond its being an expression of a background for images and visualisations. The interest for addressing these issues has emerged from a desire to bring the Satosphere space into some kind of creative becoming during the Senselab residency\u00a0Into the Midst<\/em>, from our experiments to engage processually with this supposedly unaffected space and from my own specific interest in discussing this space for immersion and virtuality through an architectural approach.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Differences need to be in play creatively when a space like the Satosphere affects, determines or even conflicts with the desired experience of immersion. The first set of differences is that between the space, which can be seen as a dome-shaped container, and the experience, which is supposed to become immersive and therefore intensive and processual. With reference to Henri Bergson\u2019s work on multiplicities, the dome-shaped and homogenous space at the SAT belongs to a category of always actualised and quantifiable extensity defined by and differentiated by size and measurements. The Satosphere measures 18 metres in diameter, is 11-13 metres in height and has 8 video projectors and 157 loud speakers1<\/sup>. Experience itself, on the contrary, is a qualitative, heterogeneous multiplicity that continuously differentiates and emerges by actualising aspects of its virtuality2<\/sup>. In this respect, virtuality is part of reality regardless of whether or not advanced technology is involved.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In the specific case of the Satosphere, the technology and the dome-shape can be regarded as conditions affecting experience and virtuality; whereas the \u2018container-space\u2019 itself, in line with the thinking of Bergson, has no virtuality. The Satosphere\u2019s conditioning of immersion and virtuality works trough delimitations of physical movement \u2013 how we move actively or sit passively in the space \u2013, and of what we see and hear. It delimits how and what we experience. All image material intended for projection needs to be edited by specific software or captured by special cameras that prepare the material for being projected onto the dome-shape. The dome-shaped space is a condition that makes us want to homogenize the image material so it fits the shape.<\/p>\n\n\n\nDifferentiations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Conditions<\/h2>\n\n\n\n